Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 384 SO2D 347 - State v. Telford

State v. Telford’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
1
states following
November 2015
most recently cited

35 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently November 2015 · most notably 438 So. 2d 1091 - State v. Johnson (1983), 422 So. 2d 370 - State v. Felde (1982)

35 state decisions

2501980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 365 So. 2d 1319 - State v. Marse · Hammontree v. Phelps · 368 So. 2d 1037 - State v. Clement · 321 So. 2d 331 - State v. Sharp · 350 So. 2d 595 - State v. Charles

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The state and the defendant shall have the right before argument to submit to the court special written charges for the jury. Such charges may be received by the court in its discretion after argument has begun. The party submitting the charges shall furnish a copy of the charges to the other party when the charges are submitted to the court. “A requested special charge shall be given by the court if it does not require qualification, limitation, or explanation, and if it is wholly correct and pertinent. It need not be given if it is included in the general charge or in another special charge to be given.” (Emphasis ours.)”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"... the trial court is required to charge the jury, when properly requested, as to the law applicable to any theory of defense which the jurors could reasonably infer from the evidence. State v. Telford, 384 So.2d 347 (La.1980); State v. Marse, 365 So.2d 1319 (La.1978). This charge must be supported by the evidence, however. State v. Telford, 384 So.2d 347 (La.1980); State v. Clement, 368 So.2d 1037 (La.1979).””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “"A requested special charge shall be given by the court if it does not require qualification, limitation, or explanation, and if it is wholly correct and pertinent."”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.