¶1The final summary judgment under review, which was entered in a quiet title action below, is affirmed upon a holding that the appellant has no title or right of title to the Miami realty in question by virtue of the subject Canadian trust agreement [see paragraph VII(e) therein] because the said trust agreement did not comply with the Florida statutory requirements [§ 689.01 Fla.Stat. (1979)], for conveying an interest in the said Miami realty [as the appellant concedes at paragraph 10 of her complaint below] and thus was ineffective to create any rights in the appellant under Florida law as to the said Miami realty. Walker v. City of Jacksonville, 360 So.2d 52 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978); Santos v. Bogh, 334 So.2d 833 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); Kyle v. Kyle, 128 So.2d 427, 429 (Fla. 2d DCA 1961).
384 So. 2d 39
Girard v. Tremblay
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided May 20, 1980
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1980-05-20
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently March 1984
1 state decisions
Relies on 128 So. 2d 427 - Kyle v. Kyle · 360 So. 2d 52 - Walker v. City of Jacksonville · Santos v. Bogh
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1980-05-20
View the full empirical analysis of this case →