384 So. 2d 409 - State v. Franzone’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

1 federal appellate · 7 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “was designed to serve the same purpose and provides at least coextensive protection”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. O'Daniel v. Indus. Serv. Solutions · Bonnie O'Daniel v. Industrial Service Solutions, e

2. “Since a landlord may be charged without a judicial finding of probable cause that publications sold from his premises are obscene, the effect of the statutes is to force landlords and tenants to consult the local prosecutor with regard to leasing and publications, thus casting that official in the role of censor of these activities.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. KMA, INC. v. City of Newport News

3. “Even though a statute may be constitutionally applied to the activities of a particular defendant, that defendant may challenge it on the basis of overbreadth if it is so drawn as to sweep within its ambit protected speech or expression of other persons not before the court.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Muschkat