Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 384 So. 2d 413 - State v. Kenner

384 So. 2d 413 - State v. Kenner’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
1
states following
February 2004
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 31 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently February 2004 · most notably 557 So. 2d 1030 - State v. Johnson (1990), 405 So. 2d 1080 - State v. Parish (1981)

1 federal appellate · 31 state decisions

270198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 369 So. 2d 118 - State v. Cox · 345 So. 2d 1129 - State v. Bennett · 360 So. 2d 842 - State v. Jackson · State v. Findley · 326 So. 2d 820 - State v. Maduell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Okay. Of course, this is attempted armed robbery and you cannot be given a suspended sentence, because there's no suspension of sentence permitted in armed robbery cases. The Court further finds that because of the fact that you are presently on probation, and you committed another more serious crime while on probation, that there is an undue risk that you will commit another crime soon as you are released. The Court feels that you are [in] need of correctional treatment in a custodial environment that can be provided most effectively by committing you to an institution. You must remember that you viciously pistol whipped the victim in this case. Throughout your trial, and coming into this Courtroom you displayed no remorse for having committed this crime.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “"One-on-one confrontation identifications are not favored. However, when a suspect is apprehended shortly after commission of an offense, a return to the scene of the crime for identification is permissible under appropriate circumstances. State v. Dunbar, 356 So.2d 956 (La., 1978). A prompt confrontation can promote fairness `by assuring reliability and the expeditious release of innocent suspects.' State v. Maduell, 326 So.2d 820 at 825 (La.)." State v. Kenner, 384 So.2d 413, 416 (La.1980).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “A peace officer may, without a warrant, arrest a person when (3) that peace officer has reasonable cause to believe that the person to be arrested has committed an offense, although not in the presence of the officer.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.