State v. Denis’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
3
states following
April 1993
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Ray · 301 So. 2d 577 - State v. Michelli · 353 So. 2d 1312 - State v. Lemelle · 304 So. 2d 322 - State v. Herman · 375 So. 2d 76 - State v. Kimble
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““There can be no doubt that a substantial right of the defendant was violated in this case when the judge refused to give the requested instruction. Under that circumstance, we cannot examine the ‘overwhelming’ nature of the evidence of guilt. See State v. Michelli, 301 So.2d 577 (La.1974); State v. Herman, 304 So.2d 322 (La.1974); State v. Lemelle, 353 So.2d 1312 (La.1977).” State v. Denis, 384 So.2d 419 , at page 420 (La.1980).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Sams
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.