Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

384 So. 2d 42

State v. Bennington

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1980-05-21

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently April 2015

2 state decisions

Relies on Reeves v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1980-05-21

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1The State appeals the denial of its oral motion to tax costs against the appellee *43made pursuant to Section 939.01, Florida Statutes (1977). We affirm.

¶2Upon proper motion, Section 939.01 requires the court to include the appropriate costs of prosecution in a judgment rendered against a convicted person. However, the defendant is entitled to prior notice and an opportunity to prepare and be heard on the issue. Cf. Reeves v. State, 372 So.2d 1016 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1979) (probationer entitled to notice prior to imposing condition of restitution). Due process requires the motion to be in writing and served on the defendant a reasonable time before the hearing on the motion. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.060.

¶3The failure of the State to file a written motion, giving the defendant an opportunity to prepare and be heard concerning the motion deprived the defendant of procedural due process. Accordingly, the trial court correctly denied the motion.

¶4AFFIRMED.

MOORE, GLICKSTEIN and HURLEY, JJ., concur.
/384/so2d/42 · .json · Public domain