State v. Custard’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
February 2002
most recently cited
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · State v. Abercrombie · State v. Procell · 375 So. 2d 1165 - State v. Mathews · 363 So. 2d 893 - State v. Carter
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“that there was sufficient evidence for a conviction if after reviewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Scott“assuming every fact to be proved that the evidence tends to prove, in order to convict, it must exclude every reasonable hypothesis of innocence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Harris“may be inferred from the circumstances of the transactions.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Washington
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.