Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

384 So. 2d 60

State v. Howell

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1980-06-04

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently January 1981

1 state decisions

Relies on Arkansas v. Sanders · Gustafson v. Florida · 258 So. 2d 1 - State v. Gustafson

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1980-06-04

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

BERANEK, Judge.

¶1This is an appeal by the State of the grant of a motion to suppress evidence seized from the defendant’s automobile. A gun, located in the console on the floor between the seats, and some marijuana, found in a briefcase in the trunk, were seized when the defendant was stopped for driving while intoxicated. We affirm as to the suppression of the marijuana, Arkansas v. Sanders, 442 U.S. 753, 99 S.Ct. 2586, 2594, 61 L.Ed.2d 235 (1979), but reverse as to the suppression of the gun.

¶2The evidence is clear that probable cause existed to stop the defendant who was driving his automobile in a very erratic and reckless manner. Further, when the defendant got out of his car, he exhibited clear signs of intoxication, including slurred speech and staggering. We consider the gun search to have been proper under State v. Gustafson, 258 So.2d 1 (Fla.1972), affirmed, Gustafson v. State, 414 U.S. 260, 94 S.Ct. 488, 38 L.Ed.2d 456 (1973), and Rivera *61v. State, 373 So.2d 64 (Fla.3d DCA 1979). We conclude that the trial court committed error in suppressing the gun and reverse and remand the cause for further proceedings consistent herewith.

¶3AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; AND REMANDED.

GLICKSTEIN and HURLEY, JJ., concur.
/384/so2d/60 · .json · Public domain