Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 384 So. 2d 730 - Walker v. State

384 So. 2d 730 - Walker v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
February 2007
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently February 2007

11 state decisions

60198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Pate v. Robinson · Keeble v. United States · Pedrero v. Wainwright · United States v. McEachern · United States v. Hall

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`the question before the court is whether there is reasonable ground to believe the defendant may be incompetent, not whether he is incompetent.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(b) If before or during the trial the court of its own motion, or upon motion of counsel for the defendant or for the State, has reasonable ground to believe that the defendant is not mentally competent to stand trial, the court shall immediately enter its order setting a time for a hearing to determine the defendant's mental condition, which shall be held no later than 20 days after the date of the filing of the motion, and shall order the defendant to be examined by no more than three nor fewer than two experts prior to the date of said hearing. Attorneys for the State and the defendant may be present at the examination.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.