Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 384 So. 2d 773 - State v. Boutte

384 So. 2d 773 - State v. Boutte’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

49
cited by 49 later decisions
3
states following
February 2019
most recently cited

49 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 49 later decisions — most recently February 2019 · most notably State v. Toomer (1981), State v. Roy (1981)

49 state decisions

2801980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Washington v. Texas · Kimball Laundry Co. v. United States · Holder v. United States · Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. Boston & Maine Railroad

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 49 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is sufficient that a party, at the time the ruling or order of the court is made or sought, makes known to the court the action which he desires the court to take, or of his objections to the action of the court, and the grounds therefor.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[o]rdinarily if hearsay evidence is admitted without objection, it becomes substantive evidence and may be used by the trier of fact to the extent of any probative or persuasive power that it has”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “evidence of the elements of the crime) and held that federal due process protects an accused against conviction except upon evidence that is sufficient fairly to support a conclusion that every element of the crime has been established beyond a reasonable doubt. 99 S.Ct. at 2786 . The Supreme Court in Jackson set forth the following test as to whether the record evidence could reasonably support a finding of guilty beyond a reasonable doubt:”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.