Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 384 S.W.2d 498 - Moore v. Commonwealth

Moore v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

1964

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
February 2010
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 2010

9 state decisions

30196419701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Muncie v. Commonwealth · Ashcraft v. Commonwealth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““When the competency of an infant to testify is properly raised it is then the duty of the trial court to carefully examine the witness to ascertain whether she (or he) is sufficiently intelligent to observe, recollect and narrate the facts and has a moral sense of obligation to speak the truth. * * *””
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.