Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 384 S.W.3d 113 - Commonwealth v. Wilson

Commonwealth v. Wilson’s Empirical Analysis

2012

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
February 2018
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Matter of Ross · United States v. Presser · MISS. COM'N ON JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE v. Bowen · Inquiry Into the Conduct of the Honorable Stacey · Thomas v. Judicial Conduct Commission

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a] judge shall accord to every person who has a legal interest in a proceeding, or that person’s lawyer, the right to be heard according to law. With regard to a pending or impending proceeding, a judge shall not initiate, permit, or consider ex parte communications with attorneys [or] ... with parties.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Where circumstances require, ex parte communications for scheduling, initial fixing of bail, administrative purposes or emergencies that do not deal with substantive matters or issues on the merits are authorized.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.