Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 384 S.W.3d 144 - Graves v. Commonwealth

Graves v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

2012

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
April 2013
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Olano · Ring v. Arizona · United States v. Perez · Grange Mutual Insurance Co. v. Trude · Winstead v. Commonwealth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[the appellant] invited the error by affirmatively agreeing to the defective instruction. ... [I]nvited errors that amount to a waiver, ie., invitations that reflect the party’s knowing relinquishment of a right, are not subject to appellate review.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.