Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

384 U.S. 892

Miller v. Rhay

Supreme Court of the United States · decided 1966-05-23

Cited by 14 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 1971

10 federal appellate · 1 district ·

Relies on 70 Wash. 2d 331 - In RE DILLENBURG v. Maxwell

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1966-05-23

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Charles Horowitz, by appointment of the Court, for petitioner.

John J. O'Connell, Atty. Gen. of Washington, and Stephen C. Way, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.

Certiorari to the Supreme Court of Washington.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

In light of the representations of the Attorney General of Washington and upon an examination of the entire record, the motion to remand is granted. The judgment of the Supreme Court of Washington is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for further consideration in light of its opinion in Dillenburg v. Maxwell, Wash., 413 P.2d 940.

/384/us/892 · .json · Public domain