Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 384 Wis. 2d 111 - State v. Mason

384 Wis. 2d 111 - State v. Mason’s Empirical Analysis

2018

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
January 2023
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Lamie v. United States Trustee · State Ex Rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane County · 208 Wis. 2d 166 - In RE MARRIAGE OF COOK v. Cook · Marx v. General Revenue Corp. · Marx v. General Revenue Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he directive that we endeavor to give meaning to all parts of statutes so as to avoid surplusage is not a directive that we give different terms different meanings, regardless where that leads”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[s]tatutory language is given its common, ordinary, and accepted meaning, except that technical or specially-defined words or phrases are given their technical or special definitional meaning.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “If this process of analysis yields a plain, clear statutory meaning, then there is no ambiguity, and the statute is applied according to this ascertainment of its meaning.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.