Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 385 A2D 189 - Fitzgerald v. Baxter State Park Authority

Fitzgerald v. Baxter State Park Authority’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
1
states following
January 2025
most recently cited

1 district · 22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently January 2025

1 district · 22 state decisions

70197819801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Sierra Club v. Morton · Holt v. College of Osteopathic Physicians & Surgeons · Lewiston Firefighters Ass'n, Local 785 v. City of Lewiston · Famous Knitwear Corp. v. Drug Fair, Inc. · Central Maine Power Co. v. Public Utilities Commission

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The membership in the Authority, obviously selected by Governor Baxter himself and ratified by him by his subsequent gifts, consists of the State's principal officers in the professions of the law, forestry, and fish and wildlife management. Both Governor Baxter and the Legislature placed their confidence in the judgment and integrity of those high state officials.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “must administer the trust like any private trustees of a charitable trust, exercising their best judgment, informed by the Attorney General's advice on any legal question and, where necessary, by instructions of a court of equity.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “This area [the Park] is to be maintained primarily as a Wilderness and recreational purposes are to be regarded as of secondary importance and shall not encroach upon the main objective of this area which is to be `Forever Wild'.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.