Matteucci v. Messersmith

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided Oct. 30, 1967.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1967-10-30

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently December 1983

1 federal appellate · 1 district ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on Messersmith v. Matteucci

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1967-10-30

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Charles E. Goff, Gudmundson, Siggins, Stone ¿UGoIf,' San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.

¶2David P. Weaver, Jr., Jack H. Werchick, San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.

¶3Before BARNES, HAMLEY and JERTBERG, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM:

¶5This is an interlocutory appeal from an order denying appellant’s motion to dismiss for lack of federal jurisdiction, based on alleged diversity of citizenship. It presents a complicated factual situation upon which the trial court concluded there was diversity, and hence jurisdiction.

¶6We approve and confirm the trial court’s finding and order (C.T. 75-79), and on the authorities therein enumerated we affirm. Messersmith v. Matteucci, D.C., 276 F.Supp. 310.