Navarro v. Gannon’s Empirical Analysis
385 F.2d 512 · 1967
Citation profile
43 federal appellate · 9 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 99 later decisions — most recently March 2017 · most notably Rosario v. Amalgamated Ladies' Garment Cutters' Union, Local 10 (1979), Schonfeld v. Penza (1973)
43 federal appellate · 9 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Calhoon v. Harvey · Walling US v. Helmerich & Payne · Dombrowski v. Pfister · Local 74, United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America v. National Labor Relations Board · United States v. Mississippi
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 99 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he Bill of Rights was incorporated into the Act, guaranteeing each union member protection against infringement of his rights to vote, to meet, and to participate in discussions on matters of concern to him and his union.”
9 later decisions quote this exact passage“Every member of a labor organization shall have equal rights and privileges within such organization to nominate candidates, to vote in elections or referendums of the labor organization, to attend membership meetings, and to participate in the deliberations and voting upon the business of such meetings, subject to reasonable rules and regulations in such organization’s constitution and bylaws.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. 553 F. Supp. 55 - United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners, AFL-CIO v. Albany, Schenectady, Troy & Vicinity District Counsel of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners, AFL-CIO · 521 F. Supp. 614 - Crowley v. Local No. 82, Furniture & Piano Moving, Furniture Store Drivers, Helpers, Warehousemen, & Packers“Any person whose rights secured by the provisions of this subchapter have been infringed by any violation of this subchapter may bring a civil action in a district court of the United States for such relief (including injunctions) as may be appropriate. Any such action against a labor organization shall be brought in the district court of the United States for the district where the alleged violation occurred, or where the principal office of such labor organization is located.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.