Nuesse v. Camp’s Empirical Analysis
385 F.2d 694 · 1967
Citation profile
196 federal appellate · 61 district · 45 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 448 later decisions — most recently June 2021 · most notably Ruiz v. Estelle (1982), United States v. Allegheny-Ludlum Industries, Inc. (1975)
196 federal appellate · 61 district · 45 state decisions — followed in 14 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 12 U.S.C. § 36
Relies on Virginian Ry Co v. System Federation No 40 · Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad · Cardillo v. United States · Securities & Exchange Commission v. United States Realty & Improvement Co. · Southern Railway Co. v. North Carolina
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 448 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the 'interest' test is primarily a practical guide to disposing of lawsuits by involving as many apparently concerned persons as is compatible with efficiency and due process.”
31 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Laker Airways Ltd. v. Pan American World Airways · 10 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1223, 10 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 10,272 George Rios, and John Gunther, Applicants to Intervene-Appellants v. Enterprise Association Steamfitters Local Union 638 of U.A., United States of America (Equal Employment Opportunity Commission), and John Gunther, Applicants to Intervene-Appellants v. Enterprise Association Steamfitters Local Union 638 of U.A.“May . . . impair or impede his ability to protect (his) interest.”
22 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“that representation of (one's) interest 'May be' inadequate.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.