Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

385 F.2d 975

Docket No. 20979.

Boxley v. United States

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1967-06-09

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently August 1967

3 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3147 (Bail Reform Act of 1984)

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1967-06-09

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Mr. Joshua Layne (appointed by this court), Washington, D. C., filed a brief for appellant.

¶2Messrs. David G. Bress, U. S. Atty., and Frank Q. Nebeker, Asst. U. S. Atty., filed a brief for appellee.

¶3Before Bazelon, Chief Judge, Wilbuk K. Miller, Senior Circuit Judge, and Danaher, Circuit Judge, in Chambers.

¶4JUDGMENT

¶5PER CURIAM.

¶6This cause came on for consideration on the record on appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and the court having considered the record on appeal and the briefs of the parties, it is

¶7Ordered and adjudged by this Court that this case be remanded to the District Court for a further hearing pursuant to Title 18 U.S.C. § 3147(b) following the filing in the District Court by the *976District of Columbia Bail Agency of a report concerning appellant, verified to the extent possible through sources provided to said Agency.

¶8The Clerk is authorized to transmit a certified copy of this order to the Clerk of the District Court as promptly as the business of his office will permit.

¶9WILBUR K. MILLER, Senior Circuit Judge, would affirm the judgment of the District Court.

/385/f2d/975 · .json · Public domain