United States v. Griffith’s Empirical Analysis
385 F.3d 124 · 2004
Citation profile
13 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently April 2020
13 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3153 (§ 201 of the Speedy Trial Act of 1974) · 18 U.S.C. § 3154 (§ 201 of the Speedy Trial Act of 1974) · 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act)
Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · Blakely v. Washington · United States v. Nixon · Harris v. New York · United States v. Havens
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“not admissible on the issue of guilt in a judicial criminal proceeding.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“(1) ... information obtained in the course of performing pretrial services functions in relation to a particular accused shall be used only for the pur1 poses of a bail determination and shall otherwise be confidential. (3) Information made confidential under paragraph (1) of this subsection is not admissible on the issue of guilt in a criminal proceeding.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the mandate in this case will be held pending the Supreme Court's decision in Booker and Fanfan " and that "the parties will have until 14 days following the Supreme Court's decision to file supplemental petitions for rehearing”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.