Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 385 F.3d 1336 - Wexler v. Lepore

Wexler v. Lepore’s Empirical Analysis

385 F.3d 1336 · 2004

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
April 2022
most recently cited

11 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently April 2022 · most notably Legg v. Wyeth (2005), Daewoo Motor America, Inc. v. General Motors Corp. (2006)

11 federal appellate ·

200200420102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Younger v. Harris · Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United States · Railroad Commission v. Pullman Co. · O'Shea v. Littleton · Rizzo v. Goode

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Fifteen Florida counties use a paperless, touchscreen method of voting. As is alleged, these touchscreen systems do not produce a paper record of votes. Accordingly, the fifteen counties where they are employed lack a manual recount procedure, which is available in Florida’s remaining fifty-two counties. In the federal claim, Plaintiffs allege this “non-uniform, differential standard” violates their rights to due process and equal protection under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[I]t has never been suggested that Younger requires abstention in deference to a state judicial proceeding reviewing legislative or executive action. Such a broad abstention requirement would make a mockery of the rule that only exceptional circumstances justify a federal court’s refusal to decide a case in deference to the States.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “a virtually unflagging duty to adjudicate claims within their jurisdiction.” Wexler v. Lepore, 385 F.3d 1336 , 1339 (11th Cir.2004) (quotation marks omitted); see also New Orleans Pub. Serv., Inc. v. Council of the City of New Orleans, 491 U.S. 350 , 358, 109 S.Ct. 2506 , 2513, 105 L.Ed.2d 298 (1989). That duty does not”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.