Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 385 F.3d 809 - Citgo Asphalt Refining Co. v. Paper, Allied-Industrial, Chemical, & Energy Workers International Union Local No. 2-991

Citgo Asphalt Refining Co. v. Paper, Allied-Industrial, Chemical, & Energy Workers International Union Local No. 2-991’s Empirical Analysis

385 F.3d 809 · 2004

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
July 2024
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently July 2024

5 federal appellate · 1 district ·

100200420102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United Steelworkers of America v. Enterprise Wheel and Car Corp · United Steelworkers v. American Manufacturing Co. · United Paperworkers International Union v. Misco, Inc. · W. R. Grace & Co. v. Local Union 759, International Union of the United Rubber, Cork, Linoleum & Plastic Workers · Eastern Associated Coal Corp. v. United Mine Workers, District 17

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the interpretation can in any rational way be derived from the agreement, viewed in the light of its language, its context and any other indicia of the parties’ intention; only where there is a manifest disregard of the agreement, totally unsupported by principles of contract construction and the law of the shop, may a reviewing court disturb the award.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “an arbitrator’s opinion and award based on 'general considerations of fairness and equity’ as opposed to the exact terms of the CBA, fails to derive its essence from the CBA.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.