Boone v. Spurgess’s Empirical Analysis
385 F.3d 923 · 2004
Citation profile
19 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 46 later decisions — most recently November 2020 · most notably Estate of Carter v. City of Detroit (2005), Del Marcelle v. Brown County Corp. (2012)
19 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Terry v. Ohio · Graham v. Connor · Michigan v. Long · Texas v. Brown
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he doctrine of issue preclusion, also known as collateral estoppel, holds that a fact or a point that was actually and directly at issue in a previous action, and was passed upon and determined by a court of competent jurisdiction, may not be drawn into question in a subsequent action between the same parties or then-privies, whether the cause of action in the two actions be identical or different.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“lawful right of access” requirement “is meant to guard against warrantless entry onto premises whenever contraband is viewed from off the premises in the absence of exigent circumstances”; thus, while”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the grant of summary judgment de novo, viewing all evidence in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Layne
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.