Canterbury v. Dick’s Empirical Analysis
1973
Citation profile
4 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 203 · 29 U.S.C. § 213
Relies on Skidmore v. Swift & Co. · Arnold v. Ben Kanowsky, Inc. · Idaho Sheet Metal Works, Inc. v. Wirtz · Wirtz v. Keystone Readers Service, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“which can never be sold at retail ... whatever the terms of the sale ... Sales of these items are nonretail whether made by truck stops or other establishments ...”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.