Moeck v. Zajackowski’s Empirical Analysis
1974
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1343 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Boddie v. Connecticut · United States v. Kras · Juna G. Morales v. Wilbut J. Schmidt
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“from interfering in any way with the presence of Richard Allen Moeck in the courtroom of this court, in Madison, Wisconsin, at 9:00 a. m., January 30, 1975.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Moeck v. Zajackowski“that it is not appropriate for this court to issue a writ of habeas corpus either to the warden or to one or both United States Marshals.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Moeck v. Zajackowski“access to a judicial determination of . . . (his) . . . federal constitutional rights and to judicial vindication of the rights.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Moeck v. Zajackowski
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.