Andrews v. Norton’s Empirical Analysis
1974
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1343 · 28 U.S.C. § 2281
Relies on Goldberg v. Kelly · Stanley v. Illinois · Griffin v. People of the State of Illinois · San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez · McGowan v. State of Maryland Gallagher
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the very minimal standards of merit which must be satisfied before a District Court may assume jurisdiction of a claim under 28 U.S.C. § 1343(3).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Andrews v. Maher“a face-to-face interview in the district office”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Andrews v. Maher
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.