385 F. Supp. 2d 74 - McCloskey v. Mueller’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (Federal Tort Claims Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1367 · 28 U.S.C. § 2674 · 28 U.S.C. § 2679 · 28 U.S.C. § 2680 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · Kentucky v. Graham · United States v. Testan · United States v. Sherwood · West v. Atkins
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“takes. . . custody of [the plaintiff] under circumstances [that] deprive the [plaintiff] of his normal opportunities for protection.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. McCloskey v. Mueller
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.