Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 385 FSUPP3D 960 - State v. Azar

State v. Azar’s Empirical Analysis

2019

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
February 2020
most recently cited

1 district ·

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 18113 · 42 U.S.C. § 18114 · 42 U.S.C. § 18115 · 42 U.S.C. § 18116 · 42 U.S.C. § 254C · 42 U.S.C. § 300 · 42 U.S.C. § 300A · 5 U.S.C. § 553 (Administrative Procedure Act of 1946)

Relies on Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe · Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Association of United States Inc v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company Consumer Alert · Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Heckler v. Chaney

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Notwithstanding any other provision of this Act, the Secretary of Health and Human Services shall not promulgate any regulation that- (1) creates any unreasonable barriers to the ability of individuals to obtain appropriate medical care; (2) impedes timely access to health care services; (3) interferes with communications regarding a full range of treatment options between the patient and the provider; (4) restricts the ability of health care providers to provide full disclosure of all relevant information to patients making health care decisions; (5) violates the principles of informed consent and the ethical standards of health care professionals; or (6) limits the availability of health care treatment for the full duration of a patient's medical needs.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “all pregnancy counseling shall be nondirective”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “For carrying out the program under [T]itle X of the PHS Act to provide for voluntary family planning projects, $ 286,479,000: Provided, [t]hat amounts provided to said projects under such title shall not be expended for abortions, that all pregnancy counseling shall be nondirective , and that such amounts shall not be expended for any activity (including the publication or distribution of literature) that in any way tends to promote public support or opposition to any legislative proposal or candidate for public office.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.