Peterson v. Sapp’s Empirical Analysis
1963
Citation profile
7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently June 1982
7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Wilson v. Roach · Houston v. Pettigrew · State Ex Rel. Department of Highways v. Weaver · Rosamond v. Reed Roller Bit Company · Wofford v. Lewis
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In Wofford v. Lewis, Okl., 377 P.2d 37 , we said: “ ‘In its literal sense, an unavoidable accident is one that could not have been prevented by any means at all, and it may be argued as an abstract proposition that there is no such thing as an unavoidable accident. However, the literal meaning has never been ascribed to the phrase “unavoidable accident” in this jurisdiction. In Wilson v. Roach, 101 Okl. 30 , 222 P. 1000 , this court held: “ ‘An “unavoidable accident” is a casualty which occurs without negligence of either party, and when all means which common prudence suggests have been used to prevent it.’ ””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.