In Re Harte

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided September 22, 2009

Supreme Court of South Carolina · decided 2009-09-22

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently February 2019

5 state decisions

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 18 U.S.C. § 981 (§ 1366 of the Money Laundering Control Act of 1986) · 18 U.S.C. § 982 (§ 1366 of the Money Laundering Control Act of 1986) · 28 U.S.C. § 2461 (Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act of 1990)

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2009-09-22

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1 ORDER

¶2 By an information filed on September 16, 2009, respondent was charged with conspiracy to commit mail fraud and money *230 laundering in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371, 18 U.S.C. § 981(a)(1)(C), 18 U.S.C. § 982(a)(1), and 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c). As a result, the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (ODC) has filed a petition asking this Court to place respondent on interim suspension pursuant to Rule 17, RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR. ODC states that respondent does not oppose issuance of the interim suspension.

¶3 IT IS ORDERED that respondent’s license to practice law in this state is suspended until further order of the Court.