Todd v. Joyner’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
12
cited by 12 later decisions
2
states following
January 2016
most recently cited
12 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Yoho v. Thompson · Todd v. Joyner
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In considering whether an expert's connection to a, defendant's insurer is sufficiently probative to outweigh the prejudice to the defendant resulting from the jury's knowledge that the defendant carries liability insurance, this Court adopted the 'substantial connection' analysis employed in a majority of jurisdictions.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ray v. Draeger“[I}f Rule 411 does not require the exclusion of evidence of insurance, the court should then proceed to perform Rule 403 analysis and consider whether the probative value of the evidence is substantially outweighed by the prejudicial effect and potential for confusing the jury.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ray v. Draeger
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.