Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 385 SO2D 1064 - Hoffman v. Kohns

Hoffman v. Kohns’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
May 2009
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently May 2009

6 state decisions

40198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Kuehmsted v. Turnwall · Rich v. Hallman · Tyson v. State · Savage v. Olson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When a person marries after making a will and the spouse survives the testator, the surviving spouse shall receive a share in the estate of the testator equal in value to that which the surviving spouse would have received if the testator had died intestate, unless: (1) Provision has been made for, or waived by, the spouse by prenuptial or postnuptial agreement; (2) The spouse is provided for in the will; or (3) The will discloses an intention not to make provision for the spouse. The share of the estate that is assigned to the pretermitted spouse shall be obtained in accordance with section 733.805.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “A marriage to which the consent of one of the parties is obtained by undue influence is merely voidable”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “cannot be attacked on this basis after the death of either party.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.