Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 385 SO2D 1149 - Lee v. State

Lee v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
August 1981
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Fessler v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Prima facie evidence of intent In a trial on the charge of burglary, proof of the entering of such structure or conveyance at any time stealthily and without consent of the owner or occupant thereof shall be prima facie evidence of entering with intent to commit an offense. (emphasis added)”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “an information purporting to charge the crime of burglary without alleging the entry was made with intent to commit a specific offense is subject to a motion to dismiss.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “with intent to commit an offense therein contrary to Florida Statutes 810.02(1)(3) and 810.07”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.