Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

385 So. 2d 1171

Docket No. 80-378.

Stallins v. State

Harold Edward STALLINS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1980-07-16

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently June 1981

4 state decisions

Relies on 381 So. 2d 1361 - State v. Cain

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1980-07-16

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Jack O. Johnson, Public Defender, and P. Douglas Brinkmeyer, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.

¶2Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Michael A. Palecki, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

¶3*1172 PER CURIAM.

¶4The State filed an information against Harold Stallins, a juvenile, pursuant to Section 39.04(2)(e)4, Florida Statutes (1979). Stallins contends that the trial court committed reversible error in not sentencing him pursuant to Section 39.111(6)(c)1-6, Florida Statutes (1979).

¶5Section 39.111(6), Florida Statutes (1979), requires that a trial court, when imposing adult sanctions on a juvenile, make findings of fact and evaluate the juvenile based on the criteria in Section 39.111(6)(c), Florida Statutes (1979). The record here reveals that Stallins was not sentenced in conformance with that statute.

¶6There being no merit to the other point raised on appeal, we affirm the judgment of the trial court but vacate the sentence. The case is remanded for resentencing pursuant to Section 39.111(6). State v. Cain,381 So.2d 1361 (Fla. 1980).

¶7GRIMES, Acting C.J., and RYDER and CAMPBELL, JJ., concur.

/385/so2d/1171 · .json · Public domain