Holland v. Hurst’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

2 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “If a building, which an architect or other workman has undertaken to make by the job, shall fall to ruin either in whole or in part, on account of the badness of the workmanship, the architect or undertaker shall hear the loss if the building falls to ruin in the course of ten years, if it be a stone or brick building, and of five years if it be built in wood or with frames filled with bricks.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. Aizpurua v. Crane Pool Co., Inc. · 546 So. 2d 311 - Linzay v. Sandy Ewing Aquatech Pools, Inc.

2. “"The installation of a swimming pool is a construction contract and not a sale. Therefore the principle of redhibition is not applicable in such cases. Catalina Pools v. Sellers, 322 So.2d 812 (La.App. 4th Cir.1975).”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Aizpurua v. Crane Pool Co., Inc.