Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 385 SO2D 56 - Smith v. Springsteen

Smith v. Springsteen’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
2
states following
September 2011
most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently September 2011

15 state decisions

901980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Marvin Dudley v. Gilbert P. Smith · Carlisle v. Miller · Hunt v. Ward · Mobile Press Register, Inc. v. Padgett · Roe v. Brown

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In subrogation cases, regardless of whether subrogation has occurred by operation of law, assignment, loan receipt, or otherwise, if the subrogor no longer has a pecuniary interest in the claim, the action shall be brought in the name of the subrogee. If the subrogor still has a pecuniary interest in the claim, the action shall be brought in the names of the subrogor and the subrogee.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.