Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 385 SO2D 733 - Kirkham v. Kirkham

Kirkham v. Kirkham’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
September 1985
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Epperson v. Epperson · 279 So. 2d 94 - Balfe v. Gulf Oil Company-Latin America · Mason v. Martino

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Unless the original trial judge is unable by reason of death, disability or other equivalent reason, or is unwilling by reason of recusation to consider a motion for rehearing, that judge should review and determine the motion. Epperson v. Epperson, 101 So.2d 367 (Fla.1958). Here, even though the circuit court assigned Judge Walker to another division, his jurisdiction to hear a motion for rehearing continued.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.