¶1Hearsay testimony was all that supported the violation of the monthly support condition. Also, there was no specific finding that appellant’s financial condition would allow him to pay the supervisory fee condition. Jones v. State, 360 So.2d 1158 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978). Therefore, we remand for the deletion of both those violated conditions on the order of revocation of probation. In all other respects, we affirm.
385 So. 2d 734
Harlow v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided July 9, 1980
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1980-07-09
Relies on Frank v. State
Decided 1980-07-09