Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 385 SO2D 740 - Carter v. Dorman

Carter v. Dorman’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
April 2009
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently April 2009

7 state decisions

40198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Alexander v. Martin · State Ex Rel. B. F. Goodrich Co. v. Trammell · 304 So. 2d 116 - De La Portilla v. De La Portilla · Crichlow v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States · 105 So. 2d 574 - Sun Insurance Company v. Boyd

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “... (a) the original judgment was entered without jurisdiction while an appeal from a non-final trial court order was pending in this Court [citation omitted]; (b) this result is not changed by the fact that the above-stated interlocutory appeal was subsequently dismissed for lack of jurisdiction [citation omitted], as this court still had jurisdiction to determine whether it had jurisdiction over the subject appeal which thereby deprived the trial court of jurisdiction to dispose finally of the cause during the pendency of said appeal [citations omitted]; and (c) the trial court now has jurisdiction to enter a new final judgment based upon the jury verdict previously rendered in this cause. [Citation omitted.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.