Bailey v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1964
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
November 1972
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 164 Tex. Crim. 321 - Fletcher v. State · Reed v. State · 171 Tex. Crim. 648 - Lockhart v. State · 168 Tex. Crim. 513 - Barker v. State · Barrera v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““This Court will not treat the failure of the state to call certain witnesses as raising a question of reasonable doubt as to the sufficiency of the evidence to support the conviction where the evidence is not obviously weak and the state does not rely on circumstantial evidence. 24 Tex.Jur. 2d 428, Sec. 745; Barrera v. State, Tex.Crim.App., 371 S.W.2d 881 ; Lockhart v. State, 171 Tex.Cr.R. 648 , 352 S.W.2d 749 ; Barker v. State, 168 Tex. Cr.R. 513, 329 S.W.2d 889 ; Musser v. State, 321 S.W.2d 882 , 167 Tex.Cr.R. 529 ; Fletcher v. State, 164 Tex.Cr.R. 321 , 298 S.W.2d 581 ; Lowe v. State, 163 Tex.Cr.R. 578 , 294 S.W.2d 394 .””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Headley v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.