Martin v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1964
Citation profile
14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently December 2007
14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Williams v. State · 34 Tex. Crim. 619 - Thulemeyer v. State · 37 Tex. Crim. 295 - Crow v. State · Ex parte Bates
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"`Venue,' as applied to criminal cases, means the place in which prosecutions are to begin, while `jurisdiction' means the power of the court to hear and determine the case, and the terms are not synonymous. Williams v. State, 145 Tex.Cr.R. 536 , 170 S.W.2d 482 ."”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“The trial court clearly had jurisdiction over the person of appellant and over the subject matter of the case. The state’s failure to prove venue did not affect the court’s jurisdiction.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ex Parte Watson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.