Alloway v. Stuart’s Empirical Analysis
1964
Citation profile
1 district · 6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently June 1992
1 district · 6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Lincoln Bank & Trust Company v. Queenan · Hawks v. Wilbert · White v. Hardin County Board of Education
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“As was pointed out in the Queenan case, the financing statement merely serves notice of, and warning to, third parties that the creditor has some interest in the property which is in the physical possession of another . . We believe substantial compliance was had (under subsection (6) of KRS 355.9-402) even though the creditor did not sign the instrument. The failure to sign could not have seriously misled anyone. [Emphasis ours.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Riley v. Miller“All circumstances in the case indicate full notice — and to enact a complete forfeiture because of a minor error during the period when even the essence of the Commercial Code was known to a few would not be in accordance with a fair conception of justice. [Emphasis ours.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Riley v. Miller““ (5) A financing statement substantially complying with the requirements of this section is effective even though it contains minor errors which are not seriously misleading.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.