Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 385 SW3D 157 - Williams v. State

Williams v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
January 2024
most recently cited

16 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Barnes v. State · Carmichael v. State · Tryon v. State · Kilpatrick v. State · Morgan v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “an admonition will usually remove the effect of a prejudicial statement unless the statement is so patently inflammatory that justice could not be served by continuing the trial. Kimble v. State , 331 Ark. 155 , 959 S.W.2d 43 (1998).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “to prevent the jurors from learning that the case had already been tried. Despite the agreement, on cross-examination Harris alluded to”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.