385 U.S. 114
Docket No. 505.
BADGLEY ET AL. v. HARE, SECRETARY OF STATE OF MICHIGAN, ET AL.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided November 21, 1966.
Supreme Court of the United States · decided 1966-11-21
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently June 1972
2 district ·
Key passage — most relied on by later courts
“The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.”
quoted by 1 later decision, including 262 F. Supp. 739 - Sincock v. Gately
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1966-11-21
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1William T. Gossett for appellants.
¶2Frank J. Kelly, Attorney General of Michigan, Robert A. Derengoski, Solicitor General, and Curtis G. Beck, Assistant Attorney General, for Hare; Theodore Sachs for Scholle et al., appellees.
¶3PER CURIAM.
¶4The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.