Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 385 Wis. 2d 471 - State v. Neill

385 Wis. 2d 471 - State v. Neill’s Empirical Analysis

2018

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
February 2020
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State Ex Rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane County · Patti J. Roberts v. T.H.E. Insurance Company · 271 Wis. 2d 469 - State v. Beasley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Statutory language is given its common, ordinary, and accepted meaning, except that technical or specially-defined words or phrases are given their technical or special definitional meaning.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “the applicable minimum and maximum fines and imprisonment under par. (am) 2. to 7. [referencing statutes for second through tenth or more OWIs] for the conviction are doubled”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.