Hamric v. Bailey’s Empirical Analysis
386 F.2d 390 · 1967
Citation profile
17 federal appellate · 5 district · 9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 41 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 2021 · most notably United States v. Agurs (1976), United States v. Boyd (1995)
17 federal appellate · 5 district · 9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Napue v. People of the State of Illinois · Mooney v. Holohan · Giles v. State of Maryland · Miller v. Pate
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Finally, on the issue of suppression, we conclude that disclosure of the undisclosed evidence after the jury had retired was too late to overcome the requirements of Brady . If it is incumbent on the State to disclose evidence favorable to an accused, manifestly, that disclosure to be effective must be made at a time when the disclosure would be of value to the accused.... Brady , to be given vitality, must be interpreted to require disclosure, at least, before the taking of the accused’s evidence is complete.” [ 386 F.2d at 393 ]”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[D]ue process is violated not only where the prosecution uses perjured testimony to support its case, but also where it uses evidence which it knows creates a false impression of a material fact.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“it is necessary for the protection of federal rights that a federal court make an independent determination of the legal effect of the facts upon which rest a claimed violation of a federal right.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Moore v. Ballone
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.