Richard F. Dyer v. Frederick C. Field, Jr.’s Empirical Analysis
386 F.2d 466 · 1967
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 3 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently August 2002
6 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Brand v. Thomas · Binstead v. Littmann · Charles B. Swain and Albert G. Schuessler v. Bob C. Crittendon
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The court disagreed with the Board's decision that this third embodiment description inherently supported the count: 37 We do not think that, merely because the core filaments are broadly disclosed by Field's 1954 specification to be distributed”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“necessary and only reasonable interpretation”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.