Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 386 F.2d 718 - Myzel v. Fields

Myzel v. Fields’s Empirical Analysis

386 F.2d 718 · 1967

Citation profile

462
cited by 462 later decisions
4
cited 4 times by the Supreme Court
14
states following
March 2014
most recently cited

223 federal appellate · 47 district · 22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 462 later decisions (4 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2014 · most notably Ernst & Ernst v. Hochfelder (1976), McNally v. United States (1987)

223 federal appellate · 47 district · 22 state decisions — followed in 14 states

2400196719701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co. · Pereira v. United States · Beacon Theaters Inc v. C Westover · Holmberg v. Armbrecht · J. I. Case Co. v. Borak

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 462 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “statute is remedial and is to be construed liberally. It has been interpreted as requiring only some indirect means of discipline or influence short of actual direction to hold a 'controlling person' liable.”
    16 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(a) Every person who, directly or indirectly controls any person liable under any provision of this title * * * or of any rule or regulation thereunder shall also be liable jointly and severally with and to the same extent as such controlled person to any person to whom such controlled person is liable, unless the controlling person acted in good faith and did not directly or indirectly induce the act or acts constituting the violation or cause of action.”
    13 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “* * * knowledge of the falseness of the impression produced by the statements or omissions made * * *”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.