Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 386 F.2d 757 - Gaines v. Carrollton Tobacco Board of Trade, Inc.

Gaines v. Carrollton Tobacco Board of Trade, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

386 F.2d 757 · 1967

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
July 2011
most recently cited

13 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 2011 · most notably Mitsubishi Motors Corporation v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth Inc Soler Chrysler-Plymouth Inc (1985), Three Rivers Motors Co. v. Ford Motor Co. (1975)

13 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

120196719701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 15 (§ 4 of the Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914) · 15 U.S.C. § 26 (§ 16 of the Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914)

Relies on Morton Salt Co. v. G. S. Suppiger Co. · Sola Electric Co. v. Jefferson Electric Co. · Simpson v. United Oil Company of California · Dalehite v. United States · Cannon v. Ellis

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[I]t seems clear as a matter of law that such an agreement, if executed in a fashion calculated to waive damages arising from future violations of the antitrust laws, would be invalid on public policy grounds.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.